darthjones wrote:
Yeah, the costume could be better. The problem is that, when they make these films, costume people are brought in and they say, "oooo, Star Wars - we are going to do it REALLY nice this time!" And they are excited in that very green way.
Here is an example of a mistake. With the money and dedication they would obviously make a very very very nice cape with tailoring and all that. But perhaps what they don't realize is that the original cape was just a flat, half circle (basically) - and as such, with no "shoulders" sewn in it pulled to the sides and caused it to hang open such that audience could see all the robot stuff down the center.
Someone trying to make it "nice" might put shoulders in - big mistake.
Helmet - using an archived helmet or the SL or a Gino or the DJ or any of that would have been far better.
But the armor - I think it is not so much the actor's shape - I doubt it was resculpted to his body. I suspect someone got a copy of armor that has distorted over time and, believe me, the LFL armors that have been made for various purposes over time have also distorted. When Kermit Eller put on the costume it looked just fine. It's not the actor - it's the costume people. Easy fix for a lot of us out here. Say what you will of Gino but I would have loved to have seen his ANH costume on this guy.
Film could have done more with less ambition - smaller story with more hardship. Should have been more hard and intimate. I suspect Kathleen Kennedy may have ideas about Star Wars that do not connect with the consumers. Her concern, and rightly, is the "brand" but, as such, it might cause them to repeat themselves over and over. This is idea of "brand" is so dumb I can't even begin. "Brand" means repeat yourself over and over. In every profession.
Just saw the movie this afternoon with my wife - went to the 12:30 showing Milwaukee CST. My wife is definitely a Star Wars fan - she's not a Star Wars nerd like I'm becoming.
Interesting thoughts so far, but DJ has brought a couple of unique ideas to the table. Will get to those in a minute.
When I watched the movie with my wife, when she first saw VADER she was OOOOOHHHHH!!! In a quiet throaty kind of way. ...as in, she thought this was COOL! Those "45" seconds, she said "Holy shit. Now we get to see Vader unleashing"... Did people forget Empire Strikes Back? Vader unleashed twice on Luke - throwing him out of a window, and then going apeship (in anger) in the third segment of the fight - right up until he cut Luke's hand off. That was at least Vader vs. a Jedi-in-training. Sorry - off topic. But yeah. That 45 seconds is just Epic, and I'm glad we get to see that side of Vader again. ...though this time against a bunch of helpless rebel troops.
Anyway. In my wife's eyes - that was Vader as she remembered him from ANH, ESB, and ROTJ. ...and in those movies - she doesn't really notice much of a difference between all of them. And believe me - she's watched those movies a LOT. We both have. But she's not a "student of the movies".
In my eyes, I saw Vader. In the brief moments they show Vader with Krennic, there wasn't enough time for me to go over every detail of the costume and try to compare it with ANH in my data banks. Even during the movie, I didn't even see/notice the gigantic cod piece you see in the movie stills. I didn't even notice if Spencer Wilding filled out the costume or not. I was just sucked into the movie, and I saw Vader. And dammit! I was SO glad I got to see Vader again. I certainly didn't see the original ANH Vader helmet, but I still saw Vader well enough.
The one thing I did notice were the red Vader helmet lenses - my wife noticed those as well, and so did a buddy of mine who is also a Star Wars fan, but not in a nerdy kind of way. To me it looked like it was method to give the lenses some definition instead of being black pits. I personally don't mind the black pits for eyes - as seen in ESB. I actually prefer it - that's what give it the feel of being skull.
The one thing about Vader that did catch me, was JEJ's voice over. That of all things, felt a bit more different than I was expecting. I was hoping for more of the deep hard throaty sound from ROTJ. Of all the Vader voices through the movies, ROTJ Vader voice can't be beat. ESB comes in a close second. ANH sounds like JEJ was recorded in an empty dumpster...
DJ's comment about the new production teams wanting to "do it really nice this time", is interesting. I believe it definitely resonated with George Lucas more than anyone else. And with that, when Lucas could design Vader with a computer we ended up with ROTS Vader. Yuck.
With Rogue One, I'm of the belief the team said, "we're going back to original Vader, and just give him some polish". ...and that's what we got. Maybe it's because I'm used to seeing the varied Vaders from ANH to ROTJ, that R1's Vader didn't bother me. I definitely didn't feel like this Vader looked like a modified Rubies and Gino insisted on the RPF. YMMV. I will say, I'm just glad we didn't get a ROTS Vader again.
As much as I loved the movie, I do wish they'd have spent a little more time showing the hardship of the rebels, and even Jyn. To me if felt like the movie should have been 2 hours and 40 minute epic war drama. Instead It's like the production team (read Disney) felt the need to keep the movie to two hours, so they jumped right from young Jyn fleeing Krennic and the Death Troopers to being caught and rescued by the Rebels. Because of that the writers simply gave Jyn's past a few verbal light touch points - and gave Cassian's past an even more brief verbal touch point. I really would have loved to see more of the Rebel struggles that inspired them to go for broke to try to steal the DS plans in a last ditch moment of desperation.
But all that's in a perfect world where LF would have wanted to make a war drama instead of just a war movie. I still loved the movie and I'm damn glad Disney and LF told this part of the Star Wars story. Now the comment about Disney being concerned with the "Brand". Yeah they should be. They invested billions of dollars into growing this franchise. Of course they're going to protect the Brand. BUT! When you sit down and watch this movie - it's about as unbranded as from any of the other Star Wars movies can be. ...aside from going completely Christopher Nolan, Alfonso Cuarón or Ridley Scott.
I love this new direction and I can't wait to see where they go with these anthology movies. I'm really hoping this gives Disney the green light to start a new series of trilogies based on the Star Wars universe that explores the battles between the rebels and empire prior to Rogue One.
I read an article that discussed the possibility of a Darth Vader anthology movie. I love this idea, where Vader his hunting for hidden Jedi, and in particular his hunt for Kenobi. The article did suggest it would be hard for an entire Vader movie to live up those awesome 45 seconds in R1. But I thoroughly disagree. In that scene he's fighting Rebel Troops, not going head-to-head with other Jedi. Like I mentioned above, we saw a glimpse of it in the third segment of his battle with Luke in ESB. But he totally backed off for obvious reasons. I want to seem him go all out...