The Prop Den

Recaster Alert: eBay's newimage58 copied off AP's
Page 1 of 2

Author:  CSMacLaren [ Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Recaster Alert: eBay's newimage58 copied off AP's

For a while, many of us have seen a very nice looking helmet kit on eBay being sold by a Seller going by "newimage58." When I contacted newimage58 last year and asked him regarding the source of his casting, he said that he was unsure of the origins but he significantly modified a kit to make it far more accurate based on his extensive study of screenshots.


(Above two shots: The newimage58 fiberglass helmet, finished).

Most recently, one of our fellow Den members and I were discussing AP helmet kits on eBay when one particular low-res photo of an AP (AuthenticProps) kit stood out. The eyes were not yet cut, and there was a distinctive rough pattern of dips/holes of the "placeholder lens" of the wearer's right eye (camera's left).


(Above: AP's kit)

This Den friend remarked that it dips/holes in the placeholder lens of the AP looked identical to that of a newimage58 stunt Stormtrooper helmet he recently acquired several weeks ago from a community member who never worked on his newimage58 helmet but instead wanted to trade up to something nicer. This is what his acquisition looks like:


(Above: Photo of the newimage58 fiberglass kit)

There was indeed a crater/hole pattern in the wearer's right eye's "placeholder lens" and thus an opportunity to compare it against that of an AP. Photos of AP's eBay auction were small, so I contacted AP who graciously sent me hi-res images.


(Above: Photo of AP's kit)

I asked the fellow Den member to photograph his helmet to match the angle and distance of the AP as closely as possible (as you've seen in the previous shot).

Here is my photographic analysis. I've merely cropped the newimage58 and adjusted for hue, contrast, and I sharpened both images:


(Above: AP's kit on the right with newimage58's helmet superimposed on the left).

I'm always one to give a vendor the benefit of doubt. I had previously thought that newimage58 started with an inaccurate kit and applied a lot of clay and sculpted a lot of detail. When I examine this, I cannot see any appreciable difference between the AP (right) and the newimage58 (left). The crater pattern in both placeholder lenses are identical.

The newimage58 appears to suffer from a loss of detail around the mouth and chin area, as the AP is clearly sharper and superior. The teeth are in identical proportions. There are various subtleties of the AP that were reproduced in the newimage58, but I'd prefer not to disclose them as we rely on these subtleties to track for recasting.

Here are two other comparisons in hi-res: ... 8_ap_2.jpg ... _vs_ap.jpg

Could newimage58 have taken an AP and made significant structural modifications? There have been people in the fandom who believe it's okay to recast someone's work so long as you put significant modifications (this is, of course, a gray area. However, I need to point out something black and white: there is a difference between doing minor mods such as sharpening detail versus uber mods such as altering the actual structure of the helmet). If vendors do not approach responsibly and honorably, they can use trick-logic to give themselves license to steal from other fans who go out of their way to purchase props and to make affordable kits available to fellow fans.

Well, here is the newimage58 helmet in transparent overlay. It's not perfect due to differing angles of photography, but I must say that it almost perfectly matches up feature for feature, especially the eyes.


Based on this overlay - which confirms the side-by-side analysis - there does not appear to be any modification to the structure and shape that could be construed as an improvement over the original AP.

I've since contacted AP and forwarded the analysis to him. I asked him to consider that newimage may have indeed modified a kit whose make he was unaware of. AP's reply to me was, "Looks like a recast to me, especially the face plate and ear pieces. I don't see what he modified as it looks identical, you can clearly see the same exact tells in the eye sockets, it's a exact imprint."

Author:  JoeR [ Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:19 pm ]
Post subject: 


Without being sarcastic, it is obviously a recast to me because it is in fibreglass. I would never buy a fibreglass one piece helmet from the bay!

Good research though.


EDIT: If it was cast from an original, he would surely be proud of the fact have mentioned it in his auctions.

Author:  No Humor Man [ Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well... though that is true about the ANH's, wasn't there at least one RotJ done in fiberglass? Forgot the name...

The research is very thorough and thanks for bringing this to our attention Mac. From what I can see from your presentation they are identical... and since we aren't all equally knowledgeable about what to look for I think it's a good idea to post these things, when they are found out.

Author:  JoeR [ Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

That was the Oakley NHM.

I am far from an expert on Stormtroopers, but for the newbies, NEVER buy a fibreglass helmet on eBay without extensive research.


Author:  CSMacLaren [ Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:12 pm ]
Post subject: 


That is an excellent suggestion to newcomers, but bear in mind that a great majority of eBay shoppers do not study props and have no idea about these things. Even large costuming organizations may not be very aware of the intrinsics of the prop industry. And some, quite frankly, don't care like we do.

Just to re-iterate, I am not the owner of this helmet, nor am I the one who found the correlation between the two helmets. I'm only independently doing my own Photoshop analysis. You decide on the results.

Author:  GundamZeppelin [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:02 am ]
Post subject: 

Good eye MacLaren

Author:  VEGAS VADER [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:09 am ]
Post subject: 

good catch Mac!!! :eek

Author:  Dark Lord [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:36 am ]
Post subject: 

The Matizza RotJ helmets were also done in fiberglass.

Author:  JoeR [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:11 am ]
Post subject: 

Mac did you get his name during your discussion? I have a feeling he may be a member of the UK Garrison.


Author:  CSMacLaren [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:37 am ]
Post subject: 

I don't know who he is off-hand. I just checked his most current auction and, at the time of this writing, the item location is West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.

His profile also reads that he's in the UK, so there is a possibility he's with the UK Garrison. Does West Yorkshire remind you of anyone in particular?

Author:  CSMacLaren [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 am ]
Post subject: 

I just checked his eBay auction which directed me to his website: ... ?submenu=0

At the very bottom is his email address which is

I reckon his name might be Chris Hob.

Author:  CGClone [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

So on his webpage he copied the MR and Java ep3 lids...and now this...fair to say this boy doesnt create much.

Author:  AnsonJames [ Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:30 pm ]
Post subject: 

I asked him what it was copied from and this was his reply;


This is not a recast of any available stormtrooper helmet,the helmet is an original sculpted design based on stormtrooper helmets from the movie.


I mailed him back and told him not to treat people like they were stupid.
What an asshole.

Author:  troopermaster [ Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:02 am ]
Post subject: 

CSMacLaren wrote:
Does West Yorkshire remind you of anyone in particular?

I am in West Yorkshire, but it aint me :blah

Do you know where abouts? I've seen sellers from Castleford and also Leeds selling trooper itmes on ebay, but I don't know anyone who is in the hobby up here. Maybe the UKG boys might know?

Author:  crow [ Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

oh you guys are just jealous! I mean, the talent that guy has to EXACTLY DUPLICATE the locations of all those little pits and dimples in the eyes!! Anyone would be envious of the uncanny ability to reproduce that from scratch!!!! :lol

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Hosted by, get your free forum now! TOS | Support Forums | Report a violation
buy web visitors
MultiForums powered by echoPHP phpBB MultiForums