Moreover not only do I not exercise such criticism but I do not agree with the concept rating or competition in anything related to art. Let the competition finally leave some activity unscathed. As for criticism it is only fruitful when it is done through personal presence and not through the press. Secondly to underline that their opinions are just his opinions and not some apocalyptic or scientific truth. Thirdly to be ready to change his views if some new thought or event leads him without remaining obstinately attached to something which he can no longer support. But what might be the dangers of me expressing personal opinions Affect the student But what student hasn't been influenced by a teacher they trust After all why should he continue to be taught by someone he doesn't trust.
If now these opinions are foreign to his temperament
e-commerce photo editing he will discard them with the greatest ease as soon as he is removed from the lessons. Even more so because they will not have surrounded themselves with the power of an indisputable truth from above. However if these views are characteristic of the student's personality and spirituality they will be a starting point for the development of his own views. But even in the case of the reactionary student the result will be positive because his need to demolish the didactic claims will push him to build a different and supportable point of view. In the final analysis I do not agree with the leveling of all opinions because this is negative for the strengthening of the artistic initiative and criticism that a creator must develop because his need to demolish doctrinal claims will push him to construct a different and supportable point of view.
The final analysis I do not agree with the leveling of all opinions because this is negative for the strengthening of the artistic initiative and criticism that a creator must develop. because his need to demolish doctrinal claims will push him to construct a different and supportable point of view. In the final analysis I do not agree with the leveling of all opinions because this is negative for the strengthening of the artistic initiative and criticism that a creator must develop. Could you briefly describe the photographic credo It is very difficult to be epigrammatic about things so complex. However I would say that I am interested in a photograph which regardless of the subject uses the world of the senses describes it with and machines and transforms it into a photographic reality.