I went back and compared the prototype eFX Legend with the production version shown more recently. So in spite of Gino's assurances that the dome flaring issue would be corrected and that it was just the fault of it being a rushed pull, I see no change. The angles look the same, the thickness of the front flaring edges look the same. So either the dome isn't out of the Rick Baker mold (ie: from a copy of something that came from the mold, for example) or there was something seriously wrong with the mold at the time the eFX master was pulled.


And it is obvious how Gino attempts to hide this by shooting the helmet against a black background and using lighting that minimizes the flaws. Who shoots a black prop against a black background? I'd like to see an auction house that does. If Gino is supposed to know so much about art direction then he should know the basics about still photography.
All someone has to do is increase the brightness of one of his photographs and the deformation of the dome flaring becomes apparent, especially when compared to a casting that came out of the same mold 20 years earlier than the eFX master casting.
And if someone thinks this is just to attack Gino, if you take responsibility and boast about something, then it better hold up to scrutiny. I would do the same with anyone who showed a Darth Vader helmet, licensed or otherwise.